- Education gap. In spite of its importance, the culture on SHM is not yet widespread. It is often considered as an accessory activity that does not require specific skills and detailed planning, while the facts are rather the opposite.
- Real structural behavior data sets. The complete data sets collected over long-terms are needed to fully understand real structural behavior and its interaction with environment. The SHM was applied to various types of structures, but the results of monitoring are frequently only partially disclosed or incomplete, thus the knowledge basis is rather deficient.
- Change in strain patterns caused by unusual behaviors. The patterns of degradation in performance and damage in monitoring results are often “masked” by environmental influences (temperature, wind, humidity, etc.) and human-made actions (live load fluctuations) and consequently, cannot be reliably identified in controlled laboratory conditions. More real data with unusual behaviors are needed in order to develop reliable detection algorithms.
- Characterization of SHM contribution to sustainability of built environment. SHM has promising potential to contribute to the sustainability of built environment since it provides with objective information concerning the real structural performance, which can be used as an input to optimize maintenance, extend structure’s life, increase safety, decrease life-cycle costs, reduce the use of construction material, minimize adverse impact on society that may occur in case of structural deficiency, and help reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
- Besides addressing above listed challenges, the Streicker Bridge will be used for full scale testing of new SHM methods, and newly developed monitoring systems.
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Structural Health Monitoring of Streicker Bridge
Monday, September 14, 2009
The Economist reports on Smart Bridges

When an eight-lane steel-truss-arch bridge across the Mississippi River in Minneapolis collapsed during the evening rush hour on August 1st 2007, 13 people were killed and 145 were injured. There had been no warning. The bridge was 40 years old but had a life expectancy of 50 years. The central span suddenly gave way after the gusset plates that connected the steel beams buckled and fractured, dropping the bridge into the river.In the wake of the catastrophe, there were calls to harness technology to avoid similar mishaps. The St Anthony Falls bridge, which opened on September 18th 2008 and replaces the collapsed structure, should do just that. It has an embedded early-warning system made of hundreds of sensors. They include wire and fibre-optic strain and displacement gauges, accelerometers, potentiometers and corrosion sensors that have been built into the span to monitor it for structural weaknesses, such as corroded concrete and overly strained joints.Some civil engineers are sceptical about whether such instrumentation is warranted. Emin Aktan, director of the Intelligent Infrastructure and Transport Safety Institute at Drexel University in Philadelphia, points out that although the sensors generate a huge amount of data, civil engineers simply do not know what happened in the weeks and days before a given bridge failed. It will take a couple of decades to arrive at a point when bridge operators can use such data intelligently.
Tuesday, September 1, 2009
Call for papers: NDE/NDT for Highways and Bridges

Friday, April 10, 2009
Tobin Memorial Bridge Monitoring

Wednesday, April 1, 2009
Dr. Bridge a new TV series on SHM
.jpg)
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
U.S. Panel on Structural Control and Monitoring

Using wireless sensors to monitor bridge safety

University of Texas (UT) professor, Dean Neikirk, will be field-testing a new bridge monitoring system within the year. The project is a collaboration between industry, government, and academia that will provide real-time monitoring of dangerous bridges and reduce inspection costs for all bridges.
"Most bridges have already been built," says Neikirk. "Our project will develop simple, low-cost equipment that can be used to retrofit existing construction as well as in new construction, but we are primarily concerned with ensuring that bridges do not fail without warning. Most aging bridges do not necessarily require replacement, they just need to be monitored for signs of corrosion and wear."
Neikirk and principal investigator and UT Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering Chair Sharon L. Wood are developing a network of low-power wireless sensors capable of capturing and transmitting data to a central location. They already have working sensors, a data collection methodology, and specifications for sensor placement. Researchers are working on (1) powering sensors with solar, wind, or traffic vibrations instead of batteries, (2) ensuring the sensor output is compatible with National Instruments (NI) equipment that will be collecting the data and that NI equipment is rugged enough for outdoor use, and (3) preventing the steel structures from interfering with the radio signals used to transmit data.
[University of Texas at Austin]
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
SAMCO Library of documents

- Monitoring Glossary
- Ambient Vibration Monitoring
- Guidelines for Structural Control
Smart bridges Research Project

Wireless Monitoring of Highway Bridges
Thursday, November 13, 2008
Weigh-In-Motion system for Stonecutters Bridge
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
SHM Shows Savings Potential in Excess of 30%

Thursday, September 25, 2008
Sensors Deliver Real-Time Info on New Minnesota Bridge

Monday, August 11, 2008
SHM Research at University of Michigan
Clarkson University’s Sazonov Performs Bridge Experiments In Malaysia

Tuesday, August 5, 2008
Bridges on I-80 monitored for stress, strain during move

Tuesday, July 29, 2008
New Minnesota laws on Bridge Inspection
Thursday, July 24, 2008
US Sweeping bridge safety bill includes fiber optic
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
Roctest Introduces New SensCore System
